A stunning incident at a temple in Thailand’s northern Chiang Mai province noticed the temple’s leading monk command a follower to shoot and kill a canine, in accordance with an nameless supply on Monday. This graphic scenario, caught on video, stirred public outrage for the cruel remedy of the animal and raised questions on monk conduct and laws surrounding firearm possession. The incident occurred in the Samoeng Nuea sub-district of Samoeng district.
The alarming video footage of the temple incident reveals the alleged monk, supposedly the temple’s abbot, getting into a hut while saying…
“Shoot it, shoot it to demise.”
Immediately afterwards, the sound of four gunshots can be heard, suspected to have been discharged by a disciple obeying the senior monk’s orders.
The complainant then shared a picture of the slain canine, a bullet wound visible on its leg and mid-back before the animal lastly succumbed. The complainant expressed ignorance about why the monk exhibited such dissatisfaction and ordered the follower to shoot the monk’s dog.
In light of this incident, the lady implored relevant departments together with animal conservation organisations and the police to analyze each the firearm used and the animal cruelty concern. She flagged the presence of different dogs throughout the temple precincts who might endure the identical destiny because the slain canine and urged law enforcement to avoid wasting them, citing existing animal protection laws.
The accuser also revealed that beforehand, she had collaborated with foreigners to donate more than a hundred,000 baht to the implicated monk for the care of stray and injured dogs. Although the temple initially agreed, they purchased cages and set up an area approximately 300 metres away from the temple for canine care, reported Sanook.
The implicated temple has only one monk as an appearing abbot. Later, the abbot’s elder brother started residing with him. Censored of 1 canine attacking and consuming a local’s chicken created dissatisfaction with the monk’s brother, who communicated the matter to the abbot earlier than the unfortunate event..